|

Reasons for Reaves
Reason number 1: We sell a totally engineered building.
With a totally engineered building, qualified & experienced suppliers put their resources together to create a reliable product. Some of the partners coming together for Reaves are Component Manufacturing Company, and Robbins Engineering. We also use Engineering Technical Services for in-plant inspections, design certification and quality control.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
| A Better Solution •
Better Insulation • More Energy Efficient • Better For The Environment • Better Strength • Myth vs. Truth |
American
Technical Services, Inc. is a multi-disciplinary engineering
firm offering geotechnical & geological engineering, materials
engineering, as well as testing & inspection services. American
Technical Services, Inc. also performs Phase I & II site assessments,
structural analysis, failure analysis, and structural design.
In the year 2000 American Technical Services compared heat
transmission loss and gain tests on various types of metal
buildings with the Reaves Building System.
The following report summarizes what American Technical Services found when comparing Heat Loss and Gain of a typical metal building to a Reaves building.
Attn: Mr. Tom Reaves, President
Gentlemen
Subject: Heat Transmission, Loss and Gain
Metal Building Comparisons
#6600 86-667
This report presents the results of our recent comparison of heat transmission loss and gain for various metal buildings. The purpose of our work was to observe various types of metal building construction and analyze the heat transmission loss for South Dakota (Winter) and gain for Pheonix, Arizona (Summer). All analysis was completed on standard buildins as defined by sales representatives on 50' X 80' X 16' high buildings. Our work was performed at the verbal request of Mr. Tom Reaves of Component Manufacturing Company on December 16, 2000.
Based on the results of our engineering analysis, it is our opinion that the heat transmission loss and gain for various buildings indicate considerable savings with the Reaves Building. The comparison included transmission losses only (i.e. losses directly through wall and roof). Since we were to compare standard building construction only, no infiltration losses (as window cracks, open doors, etc.) were analyzed since there are no standard windows and doors, etc.
These items are unique to each building.
The following summary of heat loss is as follows:
|
|
The American Technical
Services report comparing heat loss in two typical
metal buildings and a Reaves building: |
| |
Reaves Building |
Steel Building A |
Steel Building B |
|
Transmission Heat Loss (BTU/hour) |
26510 |
50460 |
78010 |
N Gas Loss for Heat
Loss Above ($/year) |
$631.00 |
$1207.00 |
$1864.00 |
Transmission Heat Loss (%) |
100% |
190% |
294% |
(This information is
based on Sioux Falls, SD weather and does not include
infiltration such as open doors, cracks around windows
and the like.) |
|
The report also compares
heat gain in two typical metal buildings and a Reaves
building : |
| |
Reaves Building |
Steel Building A |
Steel Building B |
|
Air conditioning equipment size required for transmission heat gain (BTU/hr) |
16010 |
31630 |
47660 |
Estimated cooling equipment cost for transmission heat gain ($) |
$3325.00 |
$6589.00 |
$9929.00 |
Annual cooling energy cost for transmission heat gain ($/year) |
$346.00 |
$686.00 |
$1034.00 |
Transmission heat gain (%) |
100% |
198% |
298% |
(This information is based on Phoenix, AZ weather and does not include people load, lighting load, infiltration and the like.) |
|
|
|
| |
|